For the fourth time in less than a week, we discovered a bat flapping around the house.
This morning I was awakened by unusual sound, a kind of ticking screech. tick tick tick tickticktickSCREEEEEtickticktick tick tick!
Oh, crap, I thought. A bat.
Another bat. A bat that's apparently angry about something.
Because of my now-extensive experience with bats in the house, I know that bats are quiet. If you're close enough you might hear the swish of their wings through the air. Otherwise, all you'll hear are soft thumps and scratches as they flit around making contact with walls and furniture.
A tick-screeching bat is a bat that's upset about something. Maybe a cat's gotten it, I completed my thought. By now the screeching had stopped. I closed my eyes and pretended I had dreamed it, and figuring I'd be able to clean up bat remains after the alarm clock went off.
Thump! Scratch!
Nope, it wasn't a dream. I went room to room, looking for a flapping bat, and closing the doors. I grabbed a towel from the bathroom, thinking I could use it to catch the flapping varmint and toss it outside. I knew Barbara would not approve of this plan, but she was blissfully unaware...
My plan: drive the bat out the back door. If that doesn't work out, drive it upstairs into the cul-de-sac hallway, then call animal control.
Coming downstairs, I found all the cats in the living room. Sophie up on the back of one of the chairs. The bat flapped by my head.
This story has no end. The bat did not go upstairs into the dead end. It went downstairs, into the basement, with its billion place for a bat to hide. I took a flashlight and looked around for a few minutes, but found no sign of the bat. It'll probably come out again tonight.
Barbara's calling animal control today to find out if they have any recommendations. I have no idea how they're getting in, but we're operating on the the assumption that there's a colony in the attic. More news as it develops...
Today is a high activity day:
Total miles: 25
Falls taken: many (but not from the bike)
Barbara found a piece by Grant Petersen asserting that the benefits to using clipless pedals and cycling shoes are largely illusory, and that there are tangible benefits of not using these devices.
Being retrogrouchy myself, though not, perhaps, to the same degree as Grant or Barbara, I listened to Barbara's summary, then went back to read the article myself.
As an aside, I think the term retrogrouch was coined by the cycling community, but the Urban Dictionary allows it to be applied more generally. I realized that there's a certain retrogrouchiness about my black terminal window, command pipelines, text-based email client, and text editor. But back to the actual topic...
Repeitive stress injury, Barbara intones ominously. Bad knees!
Okay, my knees crackle a bit, and there was that time we thought Barbara was going to have to summon the Coast Guard to pluck me of the cliffs on the Cornwall coastline, but on the whole I don't think my knees are that bad.
What's more, I think Grant overstates the risk of repetitive stress injury as a result of clipless pedals, at least with regard to knees. Even if my feet move around a little, my knees are still doing the same thing and undergoing the same stresses over and over. The trick is keeping the knees aligned with the feet, and this is more about proper frame size and seat height than about being clipped in. So basically, [citation needed].
What I tend to agree with, though, is the idea that special clothes are not required for day-to-day riding. Today, I commuted in regular shorts, a cotton t-shirt, and shoes with no cleats. In fact, I took extra care not to kill myself, or treat my commute like a time trial. I used a lower gear, spent more time coasting, and didn't not actively overtake other cyclists like I usually do. The result wasn't too surprising: I got to work in about the same amount of time.
I have developed the habit of wearing cycling-specific clothes to commute in, like a wicking jersey and cycling shoes and shorts, figuring, since I'm going to change clothes anyway, I might as well wear clothes designed for the activity. Well, my Brooks saddle is more comfortable without the chamois between it and me, at least for six miles, about the distance of my commute, so why bother with shorts? Eliminating cycling shoes means I don't have to carry shoes to change into (or keep a pair in my locker), which makes the logistical gymnastics simpler—a good thing.
This morning, I was getting ready for today's Planning Commission meeting, which requires me to deviate in my dress from my usual jeans and t-shirt in favor of a suit or jacket and tie.
Having pulled a less-conservative ensemble from my closet, I
said to Barbara, I need your help: can you tell me if this tie
clashes with this shirt?
She looked me up and down, then made a face.
It does...
I said, turning back to my closet.
No,
she replied. Your tie: it's so loud...
Oh, I'm not worried about that. I just want to know if the colors
don't match.
I'm not very good at that,
she told me. Besides, when I
look at you, all I can see is TIE.
Perfect, I thought, and closed my closet door.
Five things I remembered for aikido class last night:
Bonus: Five things I forgot: